How is Britney Spears the Princess of Pop when she can’t sing?
Moderate TRUTH asked:
Britney Spears has won 0 grammys
Britney Spears has won 0 grammys
Beyonce has won 16 grammys and she’s a better singer then Britney.
Christina Aguilera has won 5 grammys and a better singer then Britney.
Janet Jackson has won 5 grammys and better singer then Britney.
Lady Gaga has won 3 grammys and a better singer then Britney.
Kim Cho
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://britneypics.org/how-is-britney-spears-the-princess-of-pop-when-she-cant-sing/trackback/

Comments
Yeah, I can’t figure that one out, either.
Posted by: wehomeschool2 | April 14th, 2011 08:17
Beyonce is the princess of pop!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: tomorrow_maybe | April 16th, 2011 08:20
how is michael jackson the king of pop when he molested kids
Posted by: Michael Vick is Racist to Dogs | April 19th, 2011 13:36
I guess because she’s been in the spotlight more than the rest of them..
But I do agree with you..
Posted by: ~Miss Kayla - Stranger In Iowa~ | April 21st, 2011 21:05
You are right.
Why?
Posted by: dexy1971 | April 24th, 2011 00:54
So winning grammys makes you a good singer? You are a nameless and faceless yahoo answerer who will never be as successful as Britney, you’re just jealous that she was actually able to make a name for herself and become so popular in a short amount of time.
Posted by: illyria | April 24th, 2011 23:18
She HAS won a Grammy. Look it up before you post “facts.” She can sing, but a lot of her music is dance and bubblegum pop. She’s the princess because she started the “bubblegum pop” craze. She revolutionized pop music.
And like I said the first time, the number of awards =/= talent. Look at Taylor Swift.
Posted by: C² | April 26th, 2011 00:33
Because, she can! duh!
Posted by: Pop music is the best | April 27th, 2011 00:51
There is no Princess, Queen, or Prince of Pop.
There is a King Of Pop, Michael Jackson.
Until there is someone officially named the “Princess”, “Prince”, or “Queen” by society or someone of high importance, there is no need to worry. People just say she should be the “princess” out of opinion.
Posted by: ?PYT?™ | April 30th, 2011 12:27
grammys is for people who had made changes in lives
and had made improvments and pop was like the major
these in the late 90s and early 2ooos and well britney was
the most popular then and still comes back with songs
people do enjoy her songs though shes a wreck
all of those people you named seems to have every thing
together in there life more then brit and shes not terrible
obviously shes is doing something right cuz shes more
famous then you you know. so its just a tittle and all those
singers you named is not pop like brits pop. there all unique in
diff ways and brits like the oldest and most likley listened to
then the others like, beyonce was in a group and lady gagas
new christinas a whole diff story and janet not every one knows
her work but brits song made it all around the world like madona
yuh ? its kinda hard to explain but just cuz she dont gat grammys
dont mean any thing. theres alota thinks that deserves one
heck my life deserves one
Posted by: depp? | April 30th, 2011 23:12
Well, tough question, but I guess that the main listeners of that kind of music are teenagers. Britney’s main year was say 2001, and back then she had the IT factor. The look, the attitude, and the sound, which made her more appealing to young people. So its pretty much about pop culture,
Posted by: i love that boii:) | May 2nd, 2011 11:30
britney spears.is not the princess of pop there is no such thing
Posted by: feed me chump | May 3rd, 2011 10:01
because shes white and acted all cute….like an all American girl!!! and little girls are supposed to look up to her…..the others are too unique or black to qualify….so its what the media wants to portray .
Posted by: mz.alferez | May 4th, 2011 01:29
First off, Grammys aren’t everything so don’t base this off Grammys.
Secondly, I agree she can’t sing and I personally don’t like her music. HOWEVER she does have very good producers and writers working for her who can craft songs in such a way that mainstream, it’ll fly by as making her seem like a good “artist”. When in fact, it is Max Martin, Danja, Dr. Luke etc. who are the real talented ones.
Posted by: shadowcat | May 4th, 2011 05:35
C²
I like your answer, agreed.
Posted by: Mari C | May 6th, 2011 17:59
Britney can sing. And she has won a grammy. The grammys are **** anyway so its pointless to base talent off of awards. Beyonce isn’t even that talented. Xtina didn’t revive the teen pop phenomenon, and janet is the queen. Lady gaga is just a newcomer who wears the stuppidest outfits and has only 2 grammys. Learn your facts.
Britney, like everyone else, has her commercial voice, and her real voice. Her real voice is amazing but I wouldn’t expect you to know anything about that because you’re probably only like 10 years old.
Posted by: izzzfareal | May 9th, 2011 18:29
Moserat truth all these things sure you aren’t Keyon West, get a life one year don’t make a singer and if a singer is as old a Janet Jackson should have won 40 so that’s your opinion She still is prettier than all you mentioned.
Posted by: Joseph B | May 10th, 2011 09:45
Because shes amazing. And your blinded by fact, not talent. Grammys are merely fans of celebs voting for them to win a metal figurine.
Fans of Britney Spears don’t need to show the world shes an amazing, the only people who need to know, are her fans and her. And there are millions, whether they admit or not.
Posted by: Kil3 | May 12th, 2011 08:36
BRITNEY SPEAR IS THE WORST SINGER EVER))))
SHE’S A LIP SYNCING JOKE)))))))
Posted by: BLACK QUEEN | May 14th, 2011 03:59